Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/29/2024 in all areas

  1. Well i would like to add a suggestion for creating a new shield from syphioric. It is a bifrost shield which is a long-awaited event but this shield falls into disuse as it does not have good stats. @nikos32could u add syphioric to the crafted shield options and improve it so that it is usable. Taking advantage, the option of crafting a shield could also be improved with more information than is necessary for each one similar to wings.
    4 points
  2. It looks like that bLood was not aware what he was doing and it is not fair that he was banned. I afraid if I do a mistake, will there be the same thing happen without any warning?
    2 points
  3. I mean I totally understand why the ban was given but I think its a bit harsh and quick decision and not such a big deal ... in other words with cases like this one and others that may come , in my opinion a warning should be given to the particular person and if the issue continues proceed to a ban ... This move shows how professional you are and also try to be close to the players so they choose your server to play and spend their time and money also... I mean you are not able to be sure if this was intentional or not so this makes it 50-50 ... as the guy says he has no experience about how trovo works and also was not informed about the rules obviously... A second chance is not a wrong decision ... Its sad to throw away every effort "x" player puts in this server just for a silly mistake ... @nikos32
    2 points
  4. It is a very wrong move to permanently ban an existing situation because he does not know how to broadcast it and does it wrong. Please fix this situation, this way there will be no people left on the server. @nikos32
    2 points
  5. I've reviewed the update notes regarding the KC reward system for livestreaming, and I couldn't find any specific mention of banning due to streaming with a black screen or similar issues. It seems there might be a misunderstanding or a gap in the communication of rules about what constitutes a bannable offense in terms of streaming content. My own attempts at streaming have highlighted how easy it is to unintentionally run afoul of guidelines that aren't clearly outlined or communicated. This situation underscores the need for clearer rules and perhaps a more direct way of informing players about important updates and changes, especially ones that could result in such severe consequences as a ban. Considering the circumstances, it appears that the ban might have been an overly harsh reaction to an honest mistake. Given the lack of clear guidelines on this matter in the update notes, a review and reconsideration of the ban would seem fair. It's crucial for the community to have a clear understanding of the rules, and for those rules to be consistently applied. A dialogue between players and the ProfessionalKO team could help prevent similar issues in the future and build a stronger, more informed community.
    1 point
  6. Rainbow shield for sky please.
    1 point
  7. Pink shield please ♥
    1 point
  8. Mistakes like this can happen, but just because he is inexperienced in live streaming doesn't mean he should be banned indefinitely. He doesn't deserve it. You guys should bring him back to show that you are close to your players. That way you will show the difference of this server. @nikos32@GM_Help@GM_Knight With best regards. a.k.aTommy
    1 point
  9. I think given the lack of experience most Knight Online players have towards streaming should come in consideration when handing out penalties such as bans. I think a couple warnings in-game would be more sufficient. Also, this new 'streaming' service that was brought in the latest patch should have went through beta testing before applying such activities to the server. Obviously it was not well thought out considering the multiple changes to KC rewards. I think its only fair to wipe the slate clean and give this player another chance.
    1 point
  10. He seems to lack exprience with the subject and regrets what he did. I think we should give him another chance playin server.
    1 point
  11. Our friend 'Blood' has been familiar with the game for almost 2 years. He has never streamed before. Let alone Blood, even I, with 20 years of gaming experience, opened a stream for the first time due to this event, and I didn't know anything about it; no information was shared, no rules were detailed. I believe that the ban decision was made due to a misunderstanding of intentions. We vouch for our friend's morals and good intentions wholeheartedly. There can be no slightest hint of malice or pursuit of illegal gains. We expect this issue to be resolved with sensitivity and understanding as soon as possible. Best regards
    1 point
  12. @nikos32 everyone can make mistake
    1 point
  13. MAKAT_ESH solo assassin pk
    1 point
  14. This happened because it was a new account. It was attached so early that Trovo reported it was invalid. I'm not 100% certain on the timeline here, but it may have done so before the account was verified. As above, reattaching the account via the Control Panel fixes this.
    1 point
  15. Dear ProfessionalKO Team, I am writing to appeal the recent ban of my character, bLood and battlearea, due to alleged fake-streaming activity. I understand the seriousness of the offense and the importance of maintaining fair play within the game. I want to sincerely apologize for any unintentional violation of the game's rules. I was unaware that I was showing content other than the game, and I was not informed that displaying content outside the game screen could be considered "fake-streaming" and lead to a ban. I admit that I did not stay updated on the recent forum announcements regarding the changes to KC rewards and the addition of new activity factors. As a new player, I am still learning the ropes, and I take full responsibility for not being familiar with the updated guidelines. To clarify, I started playing Knight Online two years ago but only began streaming three days ago. Due to my inexperience with streaming, showing a black screen was an unintentional mistake, not a deliberate attempt to deceive or gain an unfair advantage. I assure you that my actions were not intentional and did not stem from any malicious intent. I kindly request you to consider lifting the ban on my character. I have familiarized myself with the updated guidelines and will ensure strict adherence to the rules in the future. I am also committed to staying updated on any future announcements through the official channels. Additionally, I would like to respectfully request that you consider the circumstances surrounding the recent update regarding the KC reward streaming system. I was not aware of the rule change, and showing a black screen was a result of this lack of awareness. Ideally, I would have appreciated the opportunity to be informed about the update and address the issue before receiving a ban.Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response and the opportunity to continue playing ProfessionalKO. @nikos32 @GM_Help @GM_Knight
    0 points
  16. GRAHAM+8--15gbs SN+7--13gbs x2 OLD WE-25gbs x2ROC-24gbs- WIND of GOD--85gbs SET SHELL+7---15gbs
    0 points
  17. "So I become a menace, a destroyer of bots." - J. Celestia Oppaiheimer
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...